In one hand, the first man has a real compromise with the true, with the life, he would be dangerous because he helps us to think and interpret our reality; on the other hand, the second man only has a compromise with the politician and economic power. After he has obtained his position, he only finds out the order when he punishs students and other people who don't accept this stupid reality but he never explain where are the money that comes out abroad his country or is hidden in the middle of us; because none of our politician want to look for it.
Why? If he attack young people and civil servants, it is both less dangerous to his life and less complicated between a paralyzed society
I didn't like to be near him because he would had been to worry about the real solution of the problems in this society or demonstrate European power that there would be a better social relation which help us to increase our level. He could choice either of them, but his way has been far of us.
Juan José Millás has writen a devastating article about this time. It would be dangerous if after read it, we will take action about our compromise with our society. Another time, I'm thinking about the Bertold Brecht's Books; it wouldn't be easy live without compromise but it would be worst tha we accept the religious, politician or economic power's driver to obtain a dull life.
Thank you, Millás, we can develop our life without all of Puigs who are in our society but we need reading you to breathe and discover that other life is possible
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario